![textadept plugins textadept plugins](https://i.stack.imgur.com/uAf3X.jpg)
- #Textadept plugins full
- #Textadept plugins code
- #Textadept plugins professional
- #Textadept plugins windows
Integrated task (ToDo items) management.
#Textadept plugins code
Integrated automatic code checkers (syntax, errors and style ).Integrated profiling and code coverage support.Integrated Python debugger including support to debug multi-threaded and multi-processing applications.Integrated sourcecode documentation system.Integrated cooperation functions (chat, shared editor).Integrated version control interface for Mercurial, Subversion and Git repositories (as core plug-ins).Advanced search functionality including project wide search and replace.eric includes a plug-in system, which allows easy extension of the IDE functionality with plug-ins downloadable from the net.
#Textadept plugins professional
It is designed to be usable as everdays' quick and dirty editor as well as being usable as a professional project management tool integrating many advanced features Python offers the professional coder. It is based on the cross platform Qt UI toolkit, integrating the highly flexible Scintilla editor control.
#Textadept plugins full
ok, maybe I was wrong, so I would like to hear your opinion.Eric is a full featured Python editor and IDE, written in Python. But I'm not ready to learn code editor completely from scratch. And it is ok if it will be differ from the editors that I use - I'm ready to spend time in learning new stuff. I would prefer to choose terminal-based code editor.
![textadept plugins textadept plugins](https://i0.wp.com/www.linuxlinks.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Screenshot-Textadept.jpg)
And I find that it has even wider range of handy code manipulation commands than Emacs provides. Currently I'm using this one as my primary code editor - just for text, not for Java. I can obtain near the same level of functionality and flexibility in any modern window-based editor such as Sublime Text or IntelliJ Idea. But the rest of the killer features of Emacs or Vim are not so unique these days. But why should I spend so many time in learning all these oldschool workarounds? So Emacs and Vim developers did what they did.
#Textadept plugins windows
Ok, ok, I know that old keyboards didn't have all these buttons, and also Windows "familiar" key bindings were defined much later. > C-Space Set beginning mark (for region marking for example) To be more specific, if Emacs would have more familiar keybindings for Windows/Mac users I probably use it. But it doesn't mean I don't want to learn at all. I don't want to spend that much time on code editor. I just said that learning barrier in case of Emacs specificially is too high for me. Oh, comeone! I didn't say I can't/don't want to learn anything. Microemacs is the editor reported to be used by Linus Torvalds. It runs in a terminal, starts up instantly, and has a small footprint. It's definitely not a toy, and might provide a nice stepping stone to full GNU Emacs. Its a micro-emacs that supports most of Emacs's common commands, but has no extensibility. Although I use GNU Emacs, there are simpler implementations. It will only take an hour or so to go through one and learn the keys and commands for straightforward editing.Īnother way to get started would be to start with a stripped down emacs. There are good tutorials for both Vim and Emacs built into the editors. This makes getting started seem difficult, but one can simply focus on learning the basics (which are all that are offered by most competing editors). The scale and breadth of add-ons for these environments is staggering. It would still be beneficial to learn Vim or Emacs. I want to look at what Textadept does about Unicode Lua doesn't yet support it very well (although there are libraries for using Unicode). Lua seems almost ideal as an extension language, and it would be a more familiar language than Emacs Lisp for most programmers.